A consequentialist ethical dilemma?

Consequentialism is an ethical theory that judges whether or not something is right by what its consequences are. For instance, most people would agree that lying is wrong. But if telling a lie would help save a person’s life, consequentialism says it’s the right thing to do.

What does consequentialism mean in ethics?

Consequentialism = whether an act is morally right depends only on consequences (as opposed to the circumstances or the intrinsic nature of the act or anything that happens before the act).

What is consequentialism in simple terms?

Consequentialism is a theory that says whether something is good or bad depends on its outcomes. An action that brings about more benefit than harm is good, while an action that causes more harm than benefit is not. The most famous version of this theory is utilitarianism.

What is wrong with consequentialism?

Problems with consequentialism

The process of identifying and weighing all the consequences, or even a number of consequences deemed sufficient to make the decision, is often too time consuming for decisions that need to be made quickly. A second problem with applying consequentialism is observer or agent limitation.

See also  Should philosophy focus more on 'ought' questions?

What is consequentialist and Nonconsequentialist?

According to consequentialism, the consequences of an action determine whether that action was moral. So we are judging the outcome, not the action itself. The other side of this is non-consequentialism, in which actions are moral if they adhere to moral law.

Do you agree with consequentialist ethics?

Consequentialism is an ethical theory that judges whether or not something is right by what its consequences are. For instance, most people would agree that lying is wrong. But if telling a lie would help save a person’s life, consequentialism says it’s the right thing to do.

What is consequentialism in health and social care?

Consequentialism: results-based ethics

Whether an act is right or wrong depends only on the results of that act. The more good consequences an act produces, the better or more right that act.

How can consequentialism be used in healthcare?

A consequentialist would choose the five patients who require less of a dosage to receive the medicine, allowing the sixth patient to die, as this produces the most moral good.

Is ethical egoism a consequentialist theory?

Ethical egoism can be understood as a consequentialist theory according to which the consequences for the individual agent are taken to matter more than any other result. Thus, egoism will prescribe actions that may be beneficial, detrimental, or neutral to the welfare of others.

What do consequentialist theories focus on?

Consequentialist theories claim that rightness and wrongness (and also virtue and vice) are determined, either directly or indirectly, by the non-moral value of consequences, or outcomes—that is, consequent states of affairs.

See also  Is philosophy anthropocentric by definition?

What is consequentialism in ethics quizlet?

Consequentialism. The way of ethical thinking, in which we think about the consequences of our actions constantly.

What is the relationship between consequentialism and situation ethics?

Situational ethics is a form of consequentialism (though distinct from utilitarianism in that the latter’s aim is “the greatest good for the greatest number”) that focuses on creating the greatest amount of love.

What is the most well known consequentialist theory of ethics?

Utilitarianism– best known consequentialist theory.

What are the differences between the consequentialist theories?

Consequentialism and Deontological theories are two of the main theories in ethics. However, consequentialism focuses on judging the moral worth of the results of the actions and deontological ethics focuses on judging the actions themselves. Consequentialism focuses on the consequences or results of an action.

How does consequentialism differ from rival approaches to ethics?

How does consequentialism differ from rival approaches to ethics? It requires us to move beyond egoistic concerns, and to focus on improving the lives of others, as well as our own. Acts are morally right just because they maximize the amount of goodness in the world.