Can the conclusion of an inductive argument be that there is only one exception to the list of evidentiary claims?

Can an inductive argument have a true conclusion?

This argument is inductively strong because if all its premises were true, then it would be highly likely or probable that its conclusion would also true. Inductively strong arguments may have: True premises, true conclusion.

What is the conclusion of inductive reasoning called?

The conclusion formed by inductive reasoning is called a conjecture.

Does inductive reasoning ends with a specific conclusion?

Inductive reasoning is a method of drawing conclusions by going from the specific to the general. It’s usually contrasted with deductive reasoning, where you go from general information to specific conclusions. Inductive reasoning is also called inductive logic or bottom-up reasoning.

How do you know if an argument is inductive?

If there is a general statement in the premises, the argument will always be inductive. If the conclusion of an argument is a generalization (all) from evidence in the premises (some), the argument will be inductive.

See also  Derrida-Searle debate - any information?

Are all inductive arguments invalid?

Inductive arguments are not usually said to be “valid” or “invalid,” but according to the degree of support which the premises do provide for the conclusion, they may be said to be “strong” or “weak” over a spectrum of varying degrees of likelihood.

Can deductive arguments be invalid?

A deductive argument is said to be valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false. Otherwise, a deductive argument is said to be invalid.

Can the conclusion of an inductively cogent argument be false explain?

A cogent inductive argument doesn’t rule out even this combination—that is, it’s possible but unlikely that a cogent inductive argument has true premises and a false conclusion. For instance, if it turns out that Tweety is an ostrich, then the premises are true but the conclusion is false.

Can an inductive argument and a deductive argument have the same conclusion quizlet?

Can an inductive argument and a deductive argument have the same conclusion? Is it possible to construct an argument with no premises? No, since there would be nothing from which to infer a conclusion.

How do inductive and deductive arguments differ?

The main difference between deductive and inductive arguments is that deductive arguments make use of all the possible facts, data, and case studies to arrive at a reasonable result and conclusion, whereas inductive arguments presenting a generalized conclusion with the help of certain observations and facts.

Can a deductive argument have a false conclusion?

A valid deductive argument can have all false premises and a false conclusion.

See also  Is there a name for a philosophy that seeks to increase human suffering?

What is a deductive argument an inductive argument?

Abstract: A deductive argument’s premises provide conclusive evidence for the truth of its conclusion. An inductive argument’s premises provide probable evidence for the truth of its conclusion.

Are inductive arguments truth preserving Why or why not?

Are inductive arguments truth-preserving? Why or why not? No,because the truth of the conclusion cannot be guaranteed by the truth of the premises,inductive arguments are not truth-preserving.

When making an inductive argument your conclusion is only as strong as?

An inductive argument can always be stronger, always be weaker. Generally, if there is more than a 50-50 chance that the conclusion will follow from the (presumed) truth of the premises, then it is strong; otherwise it is weak.

Can an argument not have a conclusion?

TRUE: A valid argument cannot have all true premises and a false conclusion. So if a valid argument does have a false conclusion, it cannot have all true premises. Thus at least one premise must be false.