Confused on Susan Wolf’s perspective on free will and moral responsibility

What does Susan Wolf say about free will and moral responsibility?

– Slogan: To be free is to be determined by the Good. sense that is required by moral responsibility–even if we are determined. But if we do the wrong thing, then we are free and morally responsible only if we are not determined (i.e. if we could have done otherwise).

What does Susan Wolf think the meaning of life is?

Meaning, according to Wolf, is a distinct kind of value that the meaningful life possesses. Furthermore, “what gives meaning to our lives gives us reasons to live, even when we do not care much, for our own sake, whether we live or die.” And this is so even when the prospects for our own well-being are bleak.

See also  How do Burkean conservatives respond to the accusation of cultural relativism?

Why is JoJo not morally responsible?

Adopting this condition for moral responsibility, then, we can see that even though JoJo’s will is structured properly on the DSV, he is not yet eligible for responsibility because he is normatively insane: he lacks “the ability to know the difference between right and wrong….” (p.

What is Wolf’s sane deep self view?

Wolf proposes the sane deep-self view states that for an individual to be morally responsible for some action they have committed, if and only if (1) this individual is able to control that action by their desires, as well as such desires are governed by their deep selves, and (2) the individual’s deep self is sane.

What is moral responsibility?

In philosophy, moral responsibility is the status of morally deserving praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or omission in accordance with one’s moral obligations. Deciding what (if anything) counts as “morally obligatory” is a principal concern of ethics.

What does moral sanity mean?

This paper is about the conditions of what I call “moral sanity,” meaning. the minimum capability to respond to practical reason that an agent must. satisfy to be held morally blameworthy or praiseworthy for some element. of their agency (e.g., an action, omission, or decision).

What is Susan Wolf’s argument?

Susan Wolf doesn’t argue that we shouldn’t try to be morally good. Rather, she argues that the popular notion of this pinnacle of moral goodness is impossible to achieve and that we should never bemoan that fact. We should help others, but if we don’t care for ourselves, we’ll never be able to do so.

See also  A book that introduces Philosophy

What Does Wolf take the relation to be between the moral life and the meaningful one?

Wolf thinks that a meaningful life must be a pleasant and fun life. Wolf argues that to live a meaningful life, one must be actively engaged in projects that one is passionately involved in. The opposite of active engagement would be boredom. A happy life may not always be a meaningful life.

What are reasons of love Susan Wolf?

My claim then is that reasons of love – whether of people, ideals or other sorts of objects – have a distinctive and important role in our lives, not to be assimilated to reasons of self-interest or to reasons of morality.

What is it to have free will according to Frankfurt?

freedom to do what one wants to do. Analogously, then, the statement that a person enjoys freedom of the will means …that he is free to want what he wants to want. More, precisely, it means that he is free to will what he wants to will, or to have the will that he wants.

What is the difference between the non philosophical and the philosophical concerns about free will and responsibility according to Wolf?

What is the difference between non philosophical and the philosophical concerns about free will and responsibility, according to Wolf? , non-philosophers concern about the application of responsibility. Philosophers are uncertain about the general conditions of responsibility.

What is a Compatibilist view on free will?

Compatibilism is the thesis that free will is compatible with determinism. Because free will is typically taken to be a necessary condition of moral responsibility, compatibilism is sometimes expressed as a thesis about the compatibility between moral responsibility and determinism.

See also  Confused by Spinoza's Use of Substance as Infinite

Do Compatibilists believe moral responsibility?

Compatibilism, as the name suggests, is the view that the existence of free will and moral responsibility is compatible with the truth of determinism.

What is the meaning of moral freedom?

Moral freedom is the freedom to live one’s life in harmony with one’s moral convictions and commitments, whether or not they are transcendent.

Is free will necessary for moral responsibility?

without free will there is no moral responsibility: if moral responsibility exists, then someone is morally responsible for something he has done or for something he has left undone; to be morally responsible for some act or failure to act is at least to be able to have acted otherwise, whatever else it may involve; to …

How does freedom affect morality?

We have freedom to do things and to decide things for ourselves. But morality teaches us to choose from the right and the wrong behavior. Morality is concern about the values, conducts, and principles of a certain person while freedom is being able to make your own decisions and getting done.

What is moral freedom and responsibility?

A long-standing position in philosophy, law, and theology is that a person can be held morally responsible for an action only if they had the freedom to choose and to act otherwise. Thus, many philosophers consider freedom to be a necessary condition for moral responsibility.