Does the free will interpretation of evil contradict God’s omnipotence?


What is the relationship between free will and evil?

God allows evil for the sake of our free will. Free will is a great good, and it is impossible for God to give us free will without allowing evil. So, God allows evil to exist. It is obviously a crucial part of this objection that it is impossible for God to both give us free will and prevent any evil from occurring.

What was one of the problems with the free will defense?

There are also two objections to the idea that free will can explain enough evil: [3] Suppose that free will is compatible with divine foreknowledge, and incompatible with determinism. Still, free will, even if it is a good thing, is not good enough to justify all the evil in the world that results from it.

See also  In the Critique of Pure Reason, what is the difference between "schema" and "synthesis"?

How can there be free will if God is omniscient?

God is omniscient and His knowledge is timeless—that is, God knows timelessly all that has happened, is happening, and will happen. Therefore, if He knows timelessly that a person will perform such-and-such an action, then it is impossible for that person not to perform that action.

What is Mackie’s argument in evil and omnipotence?

J. L. Mackie uses the problem of evil to show that belief in an all good god is irrational. Mackie argues that if an omnipotent and morally perfect god exists, why then is there so much evil in this world? He explains that the existence of evil is a direct contradiction of God being all good.

How does free will solve the problem of evil?

One argument, known as the free will defense, claims that evil is caused not by God but by human beings, who must be allowed to choose evil if they are to have free will.

Why does God give free will?

This gift comes from God’s eternal essence, and is therefore necessary. God remains free in choosing how to love, but the fact that God loves and therefore gives freedom/agency to others is a necessary part of what it means to be divine.

What is Mackie’s argument about evil?

If something is wholly good, it always eliminates as much evil as it can.

What is the paradox of omnipotence as presented by Mackie?

Mackie states the paradox as follows: “can an omnipotent being make things which he cannot subsequently control? … It is clear that this is a paradox: the questions cannot be answered satisfactorily either in the affirmative or in the negative.

See also  Dialectic of Enlightment Prerequisites

What does JL Mackie say about the problem of evil?

Atheist philosophers such as Anthony Flew and J. L. Mackie have argued that an omnipotent God should be able to create a world containing moral good but no moral evil. As Flew (1955, p.

How does Mackie define a fallacious solution to the problem of evil?

4 Fallacious Solutions: Good cannot exist without evil. Evil is necessary as a means to good. The universe is better off with some evil in it than it could be without.

What is the argument from evil against the existence of God?

The Argument from Evil is a class of arguments which purport that the existence of evil is incompatible with the existence of God. As Hume put it, “Is he willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then is he impotent.

What is the problem of evil and the existence of God?

The problem of evil refers to the challenge of reconciling belief in an omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient God, with the existence of evil and suffering in the world.

What is the problem of evil discuss?

The problem of evil refers to the challenge of reconciling belief in an omniscient, omnipotent and omnibenevolent God, with the existence of evil and suffering in the world. The problem may be described either experientially or theoretically.

What is problem of evil explain?

First published Mon Sep 16, 2002; substantive revision Tue Mar 3, 2015. The epistemic question posed by evil is whether the world contains undesirable states of affairs that provide the basis for an argument that makes it unreasonable to believe in the existence of God.

See also  Are values dominant behaviours of a society, or are they personal?