If mathematical platonism is true, is mathematics then a discovery?

For there is little doubt that we possess mathematical knowledge. The truth of mathematical platonism would therefore establish that we have knowledge of abstract (and thus causally inefficacious) objects. This would be an important discovery, which many naturalistic theories of knowledge would struggle to accommodate.

Is mathematical Platonism true?

Mathematical Platonism, formally defined, is the view that (a) there exist abstract objects—objects that are wholly nonspatiotemporal, nonphysical, and nonmental—and (b) there are true mathematical sentences that provide true descriptions of such objects.

Is mathematical Platonism plausible?

The central core of Frege’s argument for arithmetic-object platonism continues to be taken to be plausible, if not correct, by most contemporary philosophers. Yet its reliance on the category “singular term” presents a problem for extending it to a general argument for object platonism.

What is platonism theory?

Platonism is the view that there exist such things as abstract objects — where an abstract object is an object that does not exist in space or time and which is therefore entirely non-physical and non-mental.

Do mathematical objects exist?

Mathematical objects exist outside of concrete time, but they exist inside of mathematical time. So it makes sense to say that a tricle changes its shape with the flow of mathematical time, and that it has three straight edges at some mathematical times, but none at other mathematical times, in the abstract world.

See also  Is there a universally accepted definition of what constitutes 'science' from a philosophy of science perspective?

Is mathematics invented or discovered platonism?

Thirdly, since platonism ensures that mathematics is discovered rather than invented, there would be no need for mathematicians to restrict themselves to constructive methods and axioms, which establishes (iii).

Was math invented or discovered?

2) Math is a human construct.

Mathematics is not discovered, it is invented.

What is the difference between Platonism and aristotelianism?

In Philosophy

Plato believed that concepts had a universal form, an ideal form, which leads to his idealistic philosophy. Aristotle believed that universal forms were not necessarily attached to each object or concept, and that each instance of an object or a concept had to be analyzed on its own.

What is mathematical nominalism?

Nominalism is the view that mathematical objects such as numbers and sets and circles do not really exist. Nominalists do admit that there are such things as piles of three eggs and ideas of the number 3 in people’s heads, but they do not think that any of these things is the number 3.

Is math invented or discovered Wikipedia?

Mathematical realism, like realism in general, holds that mathematical entities exist independently of the human mind. Thus humans do not invent mathematics, but rather discover it, and any other intelligent beings in the universe would presumably do the same.

Why is Platonism important?

Platonism had a profound effect on Western thought. Platonism at least affirms the existence of abstract objects, which are asserted to exist in a third realm distinct from both the sensible external world and from the internal world of consciousness, and is the opposite of nominalism.

See also  Critical thinking,, writing skills

Are numbers real?

Numbers are “real” in the sense that they are a way that man organizes the relative movement between objects he observes in his environment. (e.g.This here + that there = two of those). However, numbers are not “actual”.

Is math a truth?

Mathematics itself isn’t truth, but all its results can be said to be true. Everything in mathematics begins with a set of assumptions and definitions. All proofs are pure deductive reasoning based on those assumptions and definitions.

Why is mathematics true?

Math works via having postulates, which are presumed to be true, and working from there to create proofs. It’s possible there are proofs that were accepted, that have flaws in them. But otherwise, math could be considered “true”, if you mean proven.

Is mathematical truth absolute?

In pure mathematics there is no absolute truth [Stabler]; we invent rules then see what they prove or see what is consistent with them.

Is mathematics a necessary truth?

Every true statement within the language of pure mathematics, as presently practiced, is metaphysically necessary. In particular, all theorems of standard theories of pure mathematics, as currently accepted, are metaphysically necessary.

What makes a theorem true?

A theorem is a statement that has been proven to be true based on axioms and other theorems. A proposition is a theorem of lesser importance, or one that is considered so elementary or immediately obvious, that it may be stated without proof.

Can mathematical proofs be wrong?

Many proofs have been initially accepted as correct but later withdrawn or modified due to errors. Even computer-verified proofs are not immune to this. The proof (and the proof-checker itself) may be correct but the formalization of the theorem might be wrong, in particular when it involves complicated definitions.

See also  Is it better to have big goals in life?