Is the Quine-Duhem thesis valid also for mathematics?


What does the Duhem Quine thesis say?

The substance of the thesis

The Duhem–Quine thesis argues that no scientific hypothesis is by itself capable of making predictions.

What is the Duhem hypothesis?

The Quine-Duhem thesis is a form of the thesis of the underdetermination of theory by empirical evidence. The basic problem is that individual theoretical claims are unable to be confirmed or falsified on their own, in isolation from surrounding hypotheses.

What is holism about testability?

“Holism,” is the view that what is in fact “tested” by observational evidence (if anything is) are not individual laws or theories, but rather large constellations of belief which include not only the one “theory” that is allegedly undergoing empirical “testing” but also a whole array of “auxiliary hypotheses” which …

What are the Two Dogmas of Empiricism According to Quine?

Introduction The two dogmas are (1) the analytic/synthetic distinction (2) reductionism (to sense data). Quine claims that both are ill-founded. 1. Background for Analyticity Mainly leading to the reduction of analyticity to synonymy.

Is Quine a pragmatist?

Quine is often regarded as a pragmatist philosopher. 1 Claims of membership in a philosophical school of this kind can be based on influence and location in a lineage, on similarity of ideas, or a combination of both.

See also  Prop. 2, Part I of Spinozas "Ethics"

Which of the following dogmas does Quine reject?

In his seminal paper “Two Dogmas of Empiricism” (1951), Quine rejected, as what he considered the first dogma, the idea that there is a sharp division between logic and empirical science.

Is Quine an empiricist?

Quine is a physicalist, in the sense that he considers it a scientific error not to adopt a theory which makes reference to physical objects.

Is Quine a relativist?

the term ‘relativism’ occurs very seldom in Quine’s work. In one place, he explicitly rejects relativism on the ground that it is paradoxical. 6 there is also a short paper entitled “relativism and absolutism”7 in which he says that his view of science “involves both relativistic and absolutistic strains”.

Is Quine a realist?

Quine describes himself as a “robust realist” about physical objects in the external world. This realism about objects is due to Quine’s naturalism. On the other hand, Quine’s natural- istic epistemology involves a conception of objects as posits that we introduce in our theories about the world.

Was Quine a naturalist?

The term “naturalism” has been understood in various ways; we need to see what Quine’s naturalism comes to. At one point, he describes naturalism as “the recognition that it is within science itself, and not in some prior philosophy, that reality is to be identified and described” (1981, 21).

Can epistemology be naturalized?

Some naturalists believe that epistemology should simply abandon conceptual analysis; some accept that conceptual analysis is a necessary and nonscientific part of epistemology, and conclude that only parts of epistemology can be naturalized; and some hold that conceptual analysis itself should become an experimental …

See also  What are the differences of existentialism to epicurianism?

Will Van Orman Quine?

Willard Van Orman Quine (/kwaɪn/; known to his friends as “Van”; June 25, 1908 – December 25, 2000) was an American philosopher and logician in the analytic tradition, recognized as “one of the most influential philosophers of the twentieth century”.