The infinite regress in Galen Strawson’s Basic Argument for determinism


Is Galen Strawson a determinist?

Though Strawson may be regarded as a hard determinist, he argues that indeterminism is equally incompatible with free will and moral responsibility.

What is the problem of infinite regress?

The fallacy of Infinite Regress occurs when this habit lulls us into accepting an explanation that turns out to be itterative, that is, the mechanism involved depends upon itself for its own explanation.

Why does Strawson think that we’d continue experiencing them even if determinism is true?

– Strawson thinks that if we learn that determinism is true, we would not be able to eradicate out reactive attitudes to other people. This is because reactive attitudes are just ones we have as a result of engaging in interpersonal relationships.

What does Strawson say about free will?

Strawson denies the existence of free will, but is sympathetic to its illusion: “We are not really free and truly responsible agents at all, even if we cannot help believing we are” (p. 311).

Which is part of the basic argument against freedom and responsibility quizlet?

Which is part of the Basic Argument Against Freedom and Responsibility? – Either determinism is true or indeterminism is true. – If determinism is true, then we’re not free or responsible.

See also  Are there philosophical principles that made convincing in antiquity that the Earth was a sphere?