What fallacy in Pascal’s Wager allows replacing God with the devil?

What fallacy is Pascal’s wager?

However, what we have here is the term “Pascal’s Wager” being applied solely because the payoff being considered is large – the reasoning being perceptually recognized as an instance of “the Pascal’s Wager fallacy” as soon as someone mentions a big payoff – without any attention being given to whether the probabilities …

What is the many gods objection to Pascal’s wager?

(ii) According to the many-gods objection, Pascal’s wager begs the question and hence is irrational. It assumes that if God exists then God must take a rather specific form, which few open-minded agnostics would accept.

What type of fallacy is God?

The divine fallacy is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone assumes that a certain phenomenon must occur as a result of divine intervention or a supernatural force, either because they don’t know how to explain it otherwise, or because they can’t believe that this isn’t the case.

Why did Pascal say that you should wager that God exists?

Pascal thought that evidence cannot settle the question of whether God exists, so he proposes that you should bet, or wager, on God because of what’s at stake: you have lots to gain and not much to lose.

See also  Is absurdism dated and what's beyond The Myth of Sisyphus?

Why is Pascal’s wager wrong?

Pascal’s logic is also flawed because belief in God does not always guarantee infinite joys and grace. According to the bible, the believers must strictly follow His words to enter heaven. That is, developing a fragile faith and not practicing the words of God could also lead to punishments after death.

Is Pascal’s wager logical?

1 Expert Answer. Pascal’s Wager arguably contains several logical fallacies. I’d argue that it’s at least a false dichotomy–the assumption is that there is either a God who will reward you for believing, or no God at all. But there are infinite possibilities here, not just two.

Was Kierkegaard a Fideist?

Historically, fideism is most commonly ascribed to four philosophers: Blaise Pascal, Søren Kierkegaard, William James, and Ludwig Wittgenstein; with fideism being a label applied in a negative sense by their opponents, but which is not always supported by their own ideas and works or followers.

What is Pascal’s wager quizlet?

Pascal’s Wager. a gambler’s argument for religious belief. God either exists or he doesn’t, but reason will never give us an answer. that’s why one must choose blindly to believe or not to believe in God (without being able to abstain from choosing) if you choose to believe in God and he exists.

What is the conclusion of Pascal’s wager?

Wager against God

Pascal draws the conclusion at this point that you should wager for God. Without any assumption about your probability assignment to God’s existence, the argument is invalid. Rationality does not require you to wager for God if you assign probability 0 to God existing, as a strict atheist might.

See also  Would it be amoral to kill someone who you know wishes to kill you?

What is Kierkegaard’s view about rational arguments for the existence of God?

Søren Kierkegaard (1813-1855) agreed with Kant that the existence of God could not be proven by reason. However Kierkegaard did not think that it was rational to believe in God, rather one should have faith in God even if this seems to reason to be absurd. To put it another way reason has no place in faith.

What did Søren Kierkegaard believe about God?

Kierkegaard believed that Christianity was not a doctrine to be taught, but rather a life to be lived. He considered that many Christians who were relying totally on external proofs of God were missing out a true Christian experience, which is precisely the relationship one individual can have with God.

What is existentialism According to Kierkegaard?

Søren Kierkegaard is generally considered to have been the first existentialist philosopher. He proposed that each individual—not reason, society, or religious orthodoxy—is solely tasked with giving meaning to life and living it sincerely, or “authentically”.