What is Aristotle’s argument to Zeno’s Achilles and the tortoise paradox?

What is the basic argument of Zeno’s paradox of motion Achilles and the tortoise?

Zeno’s argument rests on the presumption that Achilles must first reach the point where the tortoise started, by which time the tortoise will have moved ahead, even if but a small distance, to another point; by the time Achilles traverses the distance to this latter point, the tortoise will have moved ahead to another, …

What did Aristotle say about Zeno?

Aristotle’s refutation: Zeno is wrong in saying that there is no part of the millet that does not make a sound: for there is no reason why any such part should not in any length of time fail to move the air that the whole bushel moves in falling.

What did Aristotle say about Achilles?

Aristotle refers to Homer’s portrayal of Achilles as a character with bad traits who is still depicted as a good person; Aristotle argues that such character (morality) should be a poet’s aim. Achilles kills Hector, but Homer still manages to make Achilles look like a good and moral man overall.

See also  Are there any techniques for dealing with an arguer who continually denies facts?

What is Aristotle’s solution to the paradox of the runner?

So the course AB is traversable only by completing an infinite number of potential tasks. But that is to say that AB is traversable only by it being possible to complete an infinite number of actual tasks. But Aristotle agreed that it is impossible to traverse AB if one must complete an infinite number of actual tasks.

What is Zeno’s paradox simplified?

In its simplest form, Zeno’s Paradox says that two objects can never touch. The idea is that if one object (say a ball) is stationary and the other is set in motion approaching it that the moving ball must pass the halfway point before reaching the stationary ball.

What is the answer to Zeno’s paradox?

Or, more precisely, the answer is “infinity.” If Achilles had to cover these sorts of distances over the course of the race—in other words, if the tortoise were making progressively larger gaps rather than smaller ones—Achilles would never catch the tortoise.

What is Achilles paradox?

Meaning that Achilles could never overtake. Taken to an extreme, this bizarre paradox suggests that all movement is impossible, but it did lead to the realization that something finite can be divided an infinite number of times.

What is the paradox of Achilles and the tortoise?

The original goes something like this: The Tortoise challenged Achilles to a race, claiming that he would win as long as Achilles gave him a small head start. Achilles laughed at this, for of course he was a mighty warrior and swift of foot, whereas the Tortoise was heavy and slow.

See also  What is the fallacy when someone misrepresents someone's views but acts as if they're not

What does Zeno’s arrow paradox show quizlet?

What does Zeno’s Arrow Paradox attempt to show? It attempts to show that if space and time are discrete, then motion is impossible.

What are Zeno’s paradoxes supposed to prove?

paradoxes of Zeno, statements made by the Greek philosopher Zeno of Elea, a 5th-century-bce disciple of Parmenides, a fellow Eleatic, designed to show that any assertion opposite to the monistic teaching of Parmenides leads to contradiction and absurdity.

What is the first paradox statement that seems to contradict common sense cited in the article about Shoppes today?

Well first, the paradoxes: Paradox 1: Consumers are shopping more often, at more outlets when they say they have no time. . . . They made an average of 3.5 shopping trips per week, up from 3.2 in 1995.